Just over a week ago, Ontarians could venture into public indoor spaces fairly secure in the knowledge that people around them were vaccinated, not ill with symptomatic COVID, and curtailing their potentially virus-spreading breath with masks.

That’s all about to change. On Wednesday, Ontario announced all pandemic public health measures would end in April. Starting with mandatory masking, gone in non-medical settings on March 21, and extending to COVID screening and self-isolation.

We will have to “live with” COVID-19 as we did with the flu. But many aren’t willing to return to the dark age of respiratory virus proliferation. The soon-to-be-lifted public health measures not only reduced COVID cases and deaths, but incidence of the flu and other respiratory viruses, too, which killed hundreds of thousands of people annually pre-pandemic.

Some businesses have, at great cost, invested in air quality improvements that experts say will blunt the resurgence of COVID and other respiratory viruses as masks come off.

But business owners can’t do it alone.

Experts in infection control, occupational health and ventilation engineering say Ontario needs to set standards for and subsidize improvements to indoor air quality. Doing so, they say, will not only slow further spread of COVID, but decrease deaths from other respiratory viruses and prepare us for the next pandemic after COVID.

“To me, saying we need to ventilate and filtrate air, that is being shared in environments full of people who are sitting there for long periods of time, is as obvious as saying we should move our drinking water intake pipe upstream from our sewage,” said infection control epidemiologist Colin Furness.

Ontario certainly has the capability to improve its indoor air quality, said HVAC engineer Joey Fox, but lacks the will.

“There hasn’t been enough of a focus on ventilation and filtration,” said Fox. “There has been a strong delay in acknowledging that COVID is airborne, followed by what I believe is a lack of clear communication about it. We need a societal rethink of how we approach this virus. Good ventilation will significantly reduce transmission and significantly lower the risk of people going to places like movie theatres and restaurants.”

In Japan, restaurants and movie theatres display real-time air quality measurements to patrons. Boston Public Schools has a detailed indoor air quality and ventilation plan, which tracks various air quality metrics in each of its 4,350 classrooms and makes all information available online.

When Niagara’s acting medical officer of health, Dr. Mustafa Hirji, wanted to do something similar with schools in his district in January, he was admonished by Ontario’s chief medical officer of health, Dr. Kieran Moore.

Hirji wanted to, as Boston does, monitor CO2 levels in the classroom. The poorer the ventilation in a room, the more CO2 there is in the air from people exhaling. The more CO2 there is in a given space, the more of another person’s breath you are taking in when you inhale. Studies have shown that the risk of COVID transmission rises with CO2 levels indoors.

Moore disagreed, writing in a letter responding to Hirji that Ontario is “not aware at present of any correlation between CO2 levels and viral transmission.”

“Of course there is (a correlation), I don’t know why he would make a statement like that,” said Furness. “Ontario has not acknowledged airborne transmission of COVID. Dr. Moore has almost, I mean, he’s said it could be in the air, but he’s undecided — I think that’s appalling.”

(Moore said on Dec. 15 that Omicron “is much more infectious and there is the potential that it can spread in the air … We’re very concerned that there could be much more aerosol spread than other strains.”)

Franz Hochholdinger, owner of the Apricot Tree Cafe in Mississauga, is decided on the matter.

He said he “followed the science,” which led him to have the air quality in his restaurant assessed by a team of environmental scientists and industrial hygienists, who recommended he install HEPA filters. Hochholdinger now has four filters working to purify the air and even has a CO2 monitor on display for customers to see.

(HEPAs use fans to move air through a filter, which work to remove harmful particles from the air, including fungi, bacteria, dust and respiratory droplets and particles that contain COVID and other viruses.)

While it was worthwhile for Hochholdinger to invest in his restaurant’s air, if only to enhance the safety of his customers and staff, it was costly. He estimates he spent $15,000.

The only remediation offered by the government for an undertaking like that is the federal small businesses air quality improvement tax credit, which provides a refundable credit of 25 per cent for ventilation and filtration expenditures up to $10,000 paid between September 2021 and the end of this year.

Hochholdinger started making air quality improvements in August.

Prices like what Hochholdinger paid are beyond what much the restaurant industry can bear after two years of financial brutalization from the pandemic, he said. That’s why he hopes more subsidies and incentives will come for air quality improvement.

“In order for restaurants to get their customers back they need to show that indoor dining can be safer,” said Hochholdinger. “We see this on a daily basis, our customers appreciate our efforts.”

Furness said while Ontario’s inability to contact-trace makes it difficult to calculate how much safer Hochholdinger and other air-conscious restaurateurs like him have made their businesses, he knows it’s where he wants to eat.

“It’s very difficult to measure effect,” he said. “I can’t say, for example, ‘Oh, (Hochholdinger has) solved the problem. Let’s do everything he’s doing.’ However, he very well may have. He’s gone to great, great lengths. It may even be overkill. But his restaurant is a place I would feel comfortable.”

But subsidies on their own aren’t enough to stop other people’s breath from making us sick, Furness said. We need indoor air quality regulations, just as we do with water quality.

“I have been beating the drum to say we need indoor air quality standards if we ever want to take masks off, if we want to have restaurants considered safe,” he said. “Even when there aren’t nasty viruses circulating like COVID, we need them.”

And air standards shouldn’t just apply to businesses, Furness said. They need to be in homes, too.

“It would be enormously useful for us to have indoor air quality standards in public places, but it would be even better if we can extend them to residential buildings,” he said. “Simply targeting restaurants, gyms, workplaces and schools, that would put a dent into it. But if you really want to make a difference, you need to really think about shared indoor air more broadly.”

Until standards are set, Fox said people should look for the presence of HEPA filters and a CO2 level of less than 800 ppm as an indicator that a place is “generally safe to go.”

Standards and subsidies need to come soon. “We need an Operation Warp Speed for clean indoor air,” Fox said, referring to the U.S. vaccine development program. The end of the mask mandate and other public health measures means seasonal respiratory viruses will come roaring back after two years of dormancy — and people will die.

The Lancet, a peer-reviewed medical journal, reported that there was an “effective absence of the annual seasonal epidemic of most seasonal respiratory viruses” in Canada in the 2020-21 season.

That same absence was observed the world over.

In 2019, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control estimated there were 22,000 flu deaths in the country that year.

But in 2020, when COVID surfaced and public health measures sprang up, there were only 748 flu deaths.

COVID is more virulent and transmissible than the flu, but both can spread in the same way. Virus particles breathed out by a sick person linger in the air and can infect people who inhale them. Air filtration and ventilation works to mitigate that.

And so the same infection prevention techniques work on both COVID and the flu. Researchers believe millions of deaths the world over were averted because of public health measures.

It’s highly likely, Furness said, that many lives can be saved, from the respiratory viruses we have now and from new ones certain to arrive in the future, if air quality improvements become mandated and paid for by the government.

“We can’t ask restaurants to spend money on this,” said Furness. “I don’t think we can even really ask landlords to spend money on this. I think government needs to step up and do that. And it’s cheaper to buy HEPA filters than it is to pay for ICU beds. So I think there’s probably a really good business case for it.”

Ben Cohen is a Toronto-based staff reporter for the Star. Follow him on Twitter: @bcohenn

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Anyone can read Conversations, but to contribute, you should be registered Torstar account holder. If you do not yet have a Torstar account, you can create one now (it is free)

Sign In

Register

Conversations are opinions of our readers and are subject to the Code of Conduct. The Star does not endorse these opinions.
[ad_2]

Originally Appeared Here

Varian Medical Systems spilled thousands of gallons of toxic chemicals on its Beverly site in the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s. When the company picked up and left the city, those toxins remained behind, seeping underground into the surrounding neighborhood.

For years, in thick, jargon-laden annual reports, Varian insisted it was actively working to clean up the mess. State regulators and local officials took the company at its word, even as the “cleanup” stretched into its third decade.

It should have been obvious that whatever remediation plan the company was following was not working. But state regulators essentially put Varian in charge of the project, with little to no oversight. Whatever “work” Varian was doing took place out of the public eye, its progress reports going unread and gathering dust on the shelves of the Beverly Public Library.

Today, it should come as no surprise that the so-called cleanup has been a failure.

In November of 2021, after a series of stories in The Salem News, the company finally agreed to test bedrock on its old property to see if it was the source of chemicals spreading into nearby residential neighborhoods. Those tests revealed levels of the cancer-causing chemical trichloroethylene at 600,000 parts per billion. Experts say concerns about indoor air are raised when levels reach 300 parts per billion.

To put it another way, the toxic chemicals were found to be 2,000 times over the level of concern.

Faced with that knowledge, the state Department of Environmental Protection ruled that Varian’s cleanup operation not only was not working, but was also in violation of Massachusetts regulations. Now, Varian is under state order to develop a new plan, one with a deadline of two years to solve the problem. If it doesn’t comply, the company will face stiff fines.

To be sure, the fact that Varian is being forced to truly address the decades-old problem is welcome news, especially for homeowners in the area, many of whom had no idea of the extent of the contamination until reporting by Paul Leighton laid it bare.

But it is sadly apparent that the cleanup should have happened long ago, and Varian’s slow-walking of the work was abetted by lax oversight by the state.

At the heart of the problem is the so-called “licensed site professionals” program, approved by the state Legislature and signed into law by Bill Weld in 1993. The public-private partnership essentially puts polluters in charge of their own cleanup. Businesses hire private contractors called licensed site professionals, or LSPs, to assess and rectify the mess. The state is supposed to check in regularly.

Advocates say the system works by taking pressure off the state Department of Environmental Protection to closely monitor hundreds – if not thousands – of spills ranging from minor gas station leaks to large and complicated sites like the one at Varian.

The system, however, failed spectacularly in Beverly. The November 2021 bedrock testing that revealed the high levels of trichloroethylene was first requested by the city in 2000. Varian pushed back, saying it wasn’t necessary.

That’s 20 years during which the depth of the contamination went unexamined and unremediated.

One of the inherent weaknesses of the LSP system is that it lets companies essentially spend what they want on cleanups. And companies are going to spend as little as possible, regardless of the depth of the problem, in an effort to keep costs down.

Also, state monitoring of licensed site professionals is spotty. The Board of Registration of Hazardous Waste Site Cleanup Professionals is supposed to investigate complaints against LSPs. It is not readily apparent to the public how often that oversight occurs, as the summary of disciplinary actions listed on the board’s website was last updated in 2013.

What’s more, the public has no way of knowing how much effort companies are putting into the work.. Contracts between polluters and licensed site professionals are considered private and not subject to public records laws. Varian could be spending $5 million a year on cleanup, or $5. There’s no way for those affected to know.

It also makes it impossible to know if there are other sites like Varian across the state. Regulators don’t report progress to the public, companies reveal as little as possible, and the public is left in the dark.

The licensed site professional law is close to 30 years old. It’s time for the Legislature to revise it to require regular public updates on remediation efforts, increased oversight of projects by the state, and the opening of LSP contract details to the public.

We do not need another Varian.

[ad_2]

Originally Appeared Here

Varian Medical Systems dumped thousands of gallons of toxic chemicals on its Beverly site in the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s. When the company picked up and left the city, those toxins remained behind, seeping underground into the surrounding neighborhood.

For years in thick, jargon-laden annual reports, Varian insisted it was actively working to clean up the mess and that progress was being made. State regulators and local officials took the company at its word, even as the “cleanup” stretched into its third decade.

It should have been obvious that whatever remediation plan the company was following was not working. But state regulators essentially put Varian in charge of the project, with little to no oversight. Whatever “work” Varian was doing took place out of the public eye, its progress reports going unread and gathering dust on the shelves of Beverly Public Library.

Today, it should come as no surprise that the so-called cleanup has been a failure.

In November, after a series of stories in The Salem News, a sister paper to The Daily News, the company finally agreed to test bedrock on its old property to see if it was the source of chemicals spreading into nearby residential neighborhoods. Those tests revealed levels of the cancer-causing chemical trichloroethylene at 600,000 parts per billion. Experts say concerns about indoor air are raised when levels reach 300 parts per billion.

To put it another way, the toxic chemicals were found to be 2,000 times over the level of concern.

Faced with that knowledge, the state Department of Environmental Protection ruled that Varian’s cleanup operation not only was not working, but was also in violation of Massachusetts regulations. Now, Varian is under state order to develop a new plan, one with a deadline of two years to solve the problem. If it doesn’t comply, the company will face stiff fines.

To be sure, the fact that Varian is being forced to truly address the decades-old problem is welcome news, especially for homeowners in the area, many of whom had no idea of the extent of the contamination until reporting by Paul Leighton laid it bare.

But it is sadly apparent that the cleanup should have happened long ago, and Varian’s slow-walking of the work was abetted by lax oversight by the state.

At the heart of the problem is the so-called “licensed site professionals” program, approved by the state Legislature and signed into law by Bill Weld in 1993. The public-private partnership essentially puts polluters in charge of their own cleanup. Businesses hire private contractors called licensed site professionals, or LSPs, to assess and rectify the mess. The state is supposed to check in regularly.

Advocates say the system works by taking pressure off the state Department of Environmental Protection to closely monitor hundreds – if not thousands – of spills ranging from minor gas station leaks to large and complicated sites like the one at Varian.

The system, however, failed spectacularly in Beverly. The bedrock testing that revealed the high levels of trichloroethylene was first requested by the city in 2000. Varian pushed back, saying it wasn’t necessary.

That’s 20 years during which the depth of the contamination went unexamined and unremediated.

One of the inherent weaknesses of the LSP system is that it lets companies essentially spend what they want on cleanups. And companies are going to spend as little as possible, regardless of the depth of the problem, in an effort to keep costs down.

Also, state monitoring of licensed site professionals is spotty. The Board of Registration of Hazardous Waste Site Cleanup Professionals is supposed to investigate complaints against LSPs. It is not readily apparent to the public how often that oversight occurs, as the summary of disciplinary actions listed on the board’s website was last updated in 2013.

What’s more, the public has no way of knowing how much effort companies are putting into the work. Contracts between polluters and licensed site professionals are considered private and not subject to public records laws. Varian could be spending $5 million a year on the cleanup, or $5. There’s no way for those affected to know.

It also makes it impossible to know if there are other sites like Varian across the state. Regulators don’t report progress to the public, companies reveal as little as possible, and the public is left in the dark.

The licensed site professional law is close to 30 years old. It’s time for the Legislature to revise it to require regular public updates on remediation efforts, increased oversight of projects by the state, and the opening of LSP contract details to the public.

We do not need another Varian.

[ad_2]

Originally Appeared Here