By John P. Kamin
Friday, January 28, 2022
| 0
During a recent doctor deposition, a well-renowned internist and pulmonologist told me he was skeptical about whether COVID-19 could be transmitted by touching a surface that was previously touched by a sick person.
John P. Kamin
He referred to multiple studies calling that theory of transmission into question, including a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study found on the agency’s website. The study is notable for the fact that it estimates the odds of fomite transmission (touching of contaminated surfaces or objects) is 1 in 10,000:
Findings of these studies suggest that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection via the fomite transmission route is low, and generally less than 1 in 10,000, which means that each contact with a contaminated surface has less than a 1 in 10,000 chance of causing an infection.
If you’re a sucker like me who spent the first few months of the pandemic wiping down groceries with Lysol in a paranoid attempt to protect family members from the virus, your worst suspicions are confirmed: You wasted hours disinfecting things that didn’t need to be disinfected.
What is interesting is that the doctor’s reasons for the skepticism of fomite transmission are as follows:
- If COVID-19 droplets are placed on a surface inside your home, they are essentially moisture. Moisture can quickly dry out. Those droplets will not stay wet forever.
- The studies that initially found a higher risk of fomite transmission did not account for environmental factors, such as wind and ventilation.
- The studies that initially found a higher risk of fomite transmission also used viral RNA detection methods that were incredibly oversensitive, as in they could detect a single piece of RNA. Well, a fractional piece of an RNA molecule is not sufficient to start an infection. Even if one finds a few viral RNA molecules, those may not be sufficient to start an infection. The CDC refers to this term as “viral load in respiratory droplets.”
In summary, the wearing of masks is a far more efficient way of stopping the spread of infectious respiratory droplets as opposed to disinfecting surfaces.
So while having clean surfaces is still a good thing, that CDC study explains why you don’t have to use strong antibacterials on your groceries anymore.
John P. Kamin is a workers’ compensation defense attorney and partner at Bradford & Barthel’s Woodland Hills location. He is WorkCompCentral’s former legal editor. This entry from Bradford & Barthel’s blog appears with permission.
[ad_2]
Originally Appeared Here